Cases 91 - 100 of 302
Peterson v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
as 5:2019cv00920
Plaintiff:
Eric Jermaine Peterson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, State of and Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00872
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Plaintiff:
Bert Christopher Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00859
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Williams
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Jefferson Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
George Eugene Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handford-Bey v. Noe et al
as 6:2019cv00615
Defendant:
Glenn Casey, Alabama Department of Corrections, Guy Noe and others
Plaintiff:
James Handford-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. England et al
as 4:2019cv00471
Plaintiff:
Germaine Smart
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, The and COII Ronald England
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Dunn et al
as 6:2019cv00212
Respondent:
G Noe, Steven Marshall, Jefferson Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Willie Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Corizon Health Inc et al
as 2:2018cv02100
Defendant:
Sealy, Alabama Department of Corrections, Bibb Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perryman v. Gadsen et al
as 5:2018cv01833
Plaintiff:
Onyonski Perryman
Defendant:
Officer Gadsen, Officer Edmonds, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. State of Alabama
as 5:2018cv01691
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Talladega County Alabama, Steve Marshall and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Surles Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
