Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Broadhead v. Headley et al
as 4:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Carter Davenport, Sherry Wood and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Hopkins et al
as 4:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Secillup Joe Welch
Defendant:
Jamey Hopkins, Carlos Woods and J. Weaver
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Richie et al
as 2:2013cv02068
Plaintiff:
Robin Lane Myers
Defendant:
Patrice Richie, Michael L Wood, Synisha Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Jasper et al
as 5:2013cv01678
Plaintiff:
Cecil M Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Sonny Posey, Jeremy Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wood
as 2:2013cv01315
Plaintiff:
April Jones
Defendant:
Michael L Wood
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wood et al
as 5:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
Johnnie L Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Wood, Lonnie Daiels and Tommy Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cathey v. Patrick et al
as 2:2012cv03910
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Eugene Patrick, Green, Woods and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
