Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Sanford v. Automotaion Personal Services et al
as 5:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Andy T. Sanford
Defendant:
Automotaion Personal Services and Russell Forest Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Russell Forest Products Inc.
as 5:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Andy Tyrone Sanford
Defendant:
Russell Forest Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Alabama, State of et al
as 7:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Paris Wells
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Samuel W Junkins, Pickens County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hasty et al
as 7:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Lavarice Wilson
Defendant:
Denise Hasty, David Lance Bailey, Brantley A. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Humliz et al
as 7:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Eric Hugh Bonner
Defendant:
Caleb Andy Humliz, Pickens County Sheriff's Department, Alabama Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. West Alabama Bank of Trust et al
as 7:2021cv01127
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
West Alabama Bank of Trust, Mr Finnley, Mr Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Pickens County et al
as 7:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County, Denise Hasty, Jeremy Herd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earvin v. Hall et al
as 7:2021cv00983
Plaintiff:
Clint E Earvin
Defendant:
Todd Hall, Pickens County Sheriff Department and Andy Hamlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Dunn et al
as 7:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Benit, J Dunn, Shawnte Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettus v. Whisnatt et al
as 5:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Andy Willard Pettus
Defendant:
Carma Boyd Whisnatt, Vanessa Rich, Janice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
