Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Lewis v. Jefferson County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Courthouse, Jefferson County Jail, Judge Shelly Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Dent
as 4:2018cv02013
Defendant:
Sgt. Derrick Dent
Plaintiff:
Kent Demont Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
George Blackmon, Jr
Defendant:
Mick Hale, Brandon Kent Falls, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peckinpaugh v. Kent et al
as 2:2017cv02079
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Peckinpaugh
Defendant:
Ronnie Kent and Blount County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Blount County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Dakota Bill Smith
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility, Southern Health Partners, Pattie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Kent et al
as 2:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Skyler Charles Douglas
Defendant:
Ronnie Mack Kent and Blount County Correctional Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Kent
as 2:2014cv01934
Plaintiff:
Kendrick C Evans
Defendant:
Ronnie M Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv01105
Plaintiff:
Damian Alan Blair
Defendant:
Davis, Loyd Arrington, Ronnie Mac Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Arrington et al
as 2:2013cv02332
Plaintiff:
Craig Adolph Brooks
Defendant:
Lloyd Arrington, R. M. Kent, Donna Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Blount County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2012cv03995
Plaintiff:
Dakota Bill Smith
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility, Ronnie Mack Kent and Woodard
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
