Cases 121 - 130 of 53,945
Rogers v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Charlie Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Butler et al v. Evernest Holdings LLC
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Courtni Butler and Kristy Reneman
Defendant:
Evernest Holdings LLC doing business as Evernest LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dake v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Allan Dake
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jackson v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Sidney W Jackson, IV
Defendant:
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Richardson v. Chute et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Reuben Richardson
Defendant:
Alan William Chute and Wolfe House Movers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ouedraogo v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Halima Ouedraogo
Respondent:
Warden Neely and Director of BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc
as 4:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Denise D Mathis
Defendant:
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
