Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Williams v. Giles
as 2:2010cv01069
Petitioner:
Carlos R Williams
Respondent:
J C Giles and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Giles et al
as 7:2010cv01070
Petitioner:
Richard Earl Ward
Respondent:
J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sloan v. Giles et al
as 5:2010cv00731
Petitioner:
Reginald Deon Sloan
Respondent:
J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Giles et al
as 6:2010cv00183
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Morgan, Jr.
Respondent:
J. C. Giles and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eddins v. Giles et al
as 5:2009cv02370
Petitioner:
Gregory James Eddins
Respondent:
J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brito v. Giles et al
as 5:2009cv01957
Petitioner:
Adrian Flores Brito
Respondent:
J. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. Giles et al
as 2:2009cv01505
Plaintiff:
Marcus McQueen
Defendant:
J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Giles et al
as 3:2008cv02356
Petitioner:
Joey Dejuan Wells
Respondent:
J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald v. Giles et al
as 1:2008cv02170
Petitioner:
David McDonald
Respondent:
J. C. Giles, State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hinson v. Allen et al
as 1:2008cv02138
Petitioner:
Raymond Hinson
Respondent:
Richard Allen, J C Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
