Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Scott, C Simpson, Jason Smith and others
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Scott, J Rogers, R Gaines and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Simpson et al
as 2:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
C Simpson, S. Harrison, Jason Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Jason Smith, Daryl W Brown, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Hall et al
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Hall, Scott, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Olds et al
as 2:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
C Olds, Randy Brown, S Steed and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Price et al
as 2:2013cv01102
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Cheryl Price and C Olds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, Joseph Headley, II and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
