Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Charlette Tesmer and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, McCall and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagwell v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Chris Bagwell
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Stubbs and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Pace
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Carter and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Scott et al
as 4:2013cv02067
Plaintiff:
George Walter Presley
Defendant:
LaTonya Scott, Carl Sanders, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thigpen v. Hill et al
as 2:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
Willie Thigpen
Defendant:
Christian Hill, Hart, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
