Cases 201 - 210 of 14,497
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry A. Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Downey v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Downey
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
White v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Shawn White
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gossett v. Davidson et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
James Gossett
Defendant:
J Davidson and Luke Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stennis-Marino v. Marino et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Kena L. Stennis-Marino
Defendant:
Nolan P. Marino, Tysianna Marino and Kristie Marino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Orchid Underwriters Agency, et al
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and Orchid Underwriters Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Mattson et al v. Farudi, et al
as 1:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Carla G Mattson and James E Mattson Trust
Defendant:
Rahmeen Farudi, Taruma Fruitdale, LLC, Taruma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Phoenix East Association, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00495
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smith v. Brakefield et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tanja Laverne Smith
Defendant:
Marcus Brakefield, Jeff Moore, Sarah Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dallas v. City of Mobile, Alabama
as 1:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Christine Dallas
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
