Cases 71 - 80 of 3,909
Adam Pajer v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11146
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAJER
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Steven Gibbons v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11148
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBBONS
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC
Nicholas Bullock v. Charlie Paris, et al
as 24-10674
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS M. BULLOCK
Defendant:
CHARLIE PARIS, HUBERT PARKER, JOHN MARSHALL and others
Phillip Jones, Sr. v. Chairman, Board of Commissioners, Fulton County
as 24-10624
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, FULTON COUNTY
Malcolm Neely v. Elmore County, et al
as 24-11112
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM NEELY
Defendant:
ELMORE COUNTY, ELMORE COUNTY COMMISSION, HENRY HINES, individually and in his Official Capacity as a member of the Elmore County Commission and others
Blake Warner v. Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts
as 24-10748
Plaintiff:
BLAKE WARNER
Defendant:
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
Maria Cabezas v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 24-10685
Plaintiff:
MARIA LORENA CABEZAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI)
Mya Green, et al v. U.S. DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility, et al
as 24-11075
Plaintiff:
MYA R. GREEN and WILLIAM L. GREEN
Defendant:
U.S. DOJ OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Naman Augusta, LLC
as 24-11070
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
NAMAN AUGUSTA, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
