Cases 21 - 30 of 225
Thomas Whittle v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, TIMOTHY VAUGHN, KELLI ADAMS and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Nelson Mickens, Jr. v. State of Georgia
as 23-10677
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON MICKENS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Michael Dyer v. State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10607
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. DYER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and STATE OF GEORGIA
Glenn Bruton v. Warden, et al
as 23-10498
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLENN BRUTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Danmond Slack v. Charles Eaton, Jr., et al
as 23-10372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANMOND JONATHAN SLACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES M. EATON, JR., FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CLERK SUPERIOR COURT FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Patrick Wyatt v. Jon Wood, et al
as 23-10279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK TIMOTHY WYATT
Defendant / Appellee:
JON BOLLING WOOD, HERBERT E. BUZZ FRANKLIN, KIM WINDLE JAMES and others
Rhonda Reid v. State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10335
Petitioner / Appellant:
RHONDA REID
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GREENE COUNTY and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Danny Williams v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10021
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ADAM GREENE, SHERIFF, RICHMOND COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
