Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,277
Gabriel Nock v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11180
Petitioner: GABRIEL BRIAN NOCK
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ricardo Tull v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11172
Petitioner: RICARDO TULL
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bobby Glenn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11119
Petitioner: BOBBY GLENN
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Maurice Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11115
Petitioner: MAURICE J. JACKSON
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Louis Bradshaw v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11129
Petitioner: LOUIS LEE BRADSHAW
Defendant: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff: ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant: FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Brian Constant, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11067
Petitioner: BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Robert J. Trease v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11135
Petitioner: ROBERT J TREASE
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Yilian Ramirez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11064
Petitioner: YILIAN QUINTANA RAMIREZ
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Roque Torres v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11026
Petitioner: ROQUE TORRES
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?