Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dai-Juan Taylor v. Fulton County District Attorney, et al
as 24-11513
Plaintiff:
DAI-JUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
FULTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, POLICE CHIEF OF FAIRBURN, GA, FAIRBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Jeffery Rieber v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 23-13958
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFERY DAY RIEBER
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clarence Terry v. R. Day, et al
as 22-13282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
R. DAY and JIMMO D.
Harold Mantooth v. Floyd County, et al
as 18-12217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD JAMES MANTOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOYD COUNTY, Municipality, EMILY JOHNSON, et al (Floyd County District Attorney's Office), DARELL DONALDSON and others
Curtis Hunter v. CXW, et al
as 18-10055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Curtis Hunter v. Corrections Corporation of Am., et al
as 17-13013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Roy Hicks v. Officer Day, et al
as 17-11468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY L. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER DAY, Correctional Officer, OFFICER PASTAWAY, Correctional Officer, CAPTAIN ROBINSON, Correctional Officer and others
Alfred Days v. Mr. Crickmar, et al
as 17-10872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED DAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRICKMAR, Hays State Prison and CHIEF COUNSELOR HAMMOCK, Hays State Prison
Curtis Hunter v. Correction Corporation of Amer, et al
as 16-10959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Warren Day v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-10376
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN F. DAY
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
