Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11666
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-11667
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-10899
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10301
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON, CASEY T. BARREN, LISA TANNER and others
Ronald Lebed, Sr. v. U.S. Postal Inspector, et al
as 23-13284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD N. LEBED, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, SERVICE, DANNIELLE MUNGO, LISA FRAZIER and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Waseem Daker v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 18-13323
Movant - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigation and Compliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
Darnell Nolley v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 18-11668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MACON SP WARDEN, RICKY MYRICK, Director of Investigations and Compliance Inmate Affairs, Macon State Prison, LISA FOUNTAIN, Interim Manager of Inmate Affairs Unit, Macon State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
