Cases 21 - 30 of 3,805
Antonio CaballeroIn re: Antonio Caballero
as 24-11432
Petitioner:
In re: ANTONIO CABALLERO
Respondent:
FUERZAS ARMADAS REVOLUCIONARIAS DE COLOMBIA, NORTE DE VALLE CARTEL, SUNSTATE BANK and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
In re: Thomas McClary, et al
as 24-11397
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS MCCLARY and FIFTH AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, COMMODORES ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, DAVID FISH and others
National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Protection Services, LLC
as 24-11370
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC, d.b.a. Allied Universal Security Services
Crystal Maye v. Brevard County Tax Collector, et al
as 24-11344
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MAYE
Defendant:
BREVARD COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, OCEAN TAX DEED INVESTMENT, LLC. and BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Mill Road 36 Henry, LLC, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-11334
Petitioner:
MILL ROAD 36 HENRY, LLC, MR36 MANAGER, LLC and TAX MATTERS PARTNER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Darwin Quinn, et al v. Roland Powell, et al
as 24-11414
Plaintiff:
DARWIN QUINN and MITCHELLE'L SIUM
Defendant:
ROLAND POWELL, p.k.a. Lil Duval, RICH BROKE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and COREY DENNARD, p.k.a. Mr. Hanky
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MC3 Investments LLC v. The Local Brand Inc
as 24-11312
Plaintiff:
MC3 INVESTMENTS LLC
Defendant:
THE LOCAL BRAND INC
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Ezemarval, LLC v. El Instituto Postal Dominicano
as 24-11306
Plaintiff:
EZEMARVAL, LLC, d.b.a. Miacargo Group
Defendant:
EL INSTITUTO POSTAL DOMINICANO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
