Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Nadine McIndoo v. Broward County, et al
as 17-15010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NADINE MCINDOO
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWARD COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ, CASSANDRA MATHIS-SCARBROUGH and others
Auntavious Curry v. Warden, et al
as 17-14442
Petitioner - Appellant:
AUNTAVIOUS JASHON CURRY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
West Morgan - East Lawrence v. Charles Owens, et al
as 17-12381
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHARLES OWENS, ANGELIA ABBASI, MOHAMMAD ABBASI and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEST MORGAN-EAST LAWRENCE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, TOMMY LINDSEY, LANETTE LINDSEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
3M COMPANY, DYNEON, LLC and DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.
:
SERVICE
USA v. Willie Johnson
as 17-12300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE CURRY JOHNSON, a.k.a. Baby J
Denise Curry, et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al
as 17-10920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE CURRY and LAKETIA CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
American Casualty Company v. Samuel Belcher, et al
as 17-10848
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant - Appellant:
DELPHINE METCALF, Individually, HELEN PLUSKOT, Individually, CATHERINE HOECHERL, Individually and others
:
SERVICE
USA v. Ralph Curry
as 17-10816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH CURRY
Ralph Curry v. USA
as 17-10822
Petitioner - Appellee:
RALPH CURRY
Respondent - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Erskine Curry v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-16496
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERSKINE L. CURRY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Franklin Williams v. Martin Eaves, et al
as 16-15911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN H. EAVES, RICHARD E. CURRIE, MELBA H. FIVEASH, Clerk Ware County Jury Commissioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
