Cases 31 - 40 of 200
Stacy Terry v. Matthew Robinett, et al
as 22-13004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW W. ROBINETT, Counsel, in his official and personal capacity, J.R. GAINES, Judge, in his official and personal capacity, AMANDA BESHEAR COOK, Counsel, in her official and personal capacity and others
Gregg Lowes v. Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD.
as 22-10570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGG LOWES, a resident and citizen of Canada
Defendant / Appellee:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
Fabio Lobo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low, et al
as 22-10495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FABIO PORFIRIO LOBO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Patrick Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-10036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Nicholis Garner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 21-14518
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLIS COREY GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-14485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hector Guagua-Alarcon v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 21-14238
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR LEONARDO GUAGUA-ALARCON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
James Graham v. Warden
as 21-13842
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - LOW WARDEN
Carlos Bayon v. Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Low
as 21-13187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS BAYON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX COLEMAN-LOW and FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Carlos Bayon v. Federal Correctional Complex Coleman-Low, et al
as 21-13204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS BAYON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX COLEMAN-LOW, BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
