Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Bobby Curry, Jr. v. Grace Point, et al
as 16-14113
Plaintiff - Appellant: BOBBY LEWIS CURRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: GRACE POINT and LAUREN MAYHUGH COHN
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-14070
Petitioner - Appellant: FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
In re: Ralph Curry
as 16-13231
Petitioner: In re: RALPH CURRY
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Curry v. USA
as 16-12981
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL W. CURRY
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Curry, et al v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-12041
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM A. CURRY, ROBERT L. CLAXTON, JOHN R. SULLIVAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: TD AMERITRADE, INC., f.k.a. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc., TD AMERITRADE CLEARING, INC. and TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION, successor in interest to TD Waterhouse Group, Inc., f.k.a. Ameritrade Holding Corporation
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-10958
Petitioner - Appellant: FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
USA v. Samuel Curry, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10818
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SAMUEL CURRY, JR.
In re: Willie Johnson
as 16-10748
Petitioner: In re: WILLIE CURRY JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franklin Williams v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 16-10574
Petitioner - Appellant: FRANKLIN L. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, R. E. CURRIE, D.A. and MARTIN EAVES
USA v. Quantaves Curry
as 15-15334
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: QUANTAVES CURRY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?