Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Roy Hicks v. Officer Day, et al
as 17-11468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY L. HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER DAY, Correctional Officer, OFFICER PASTAWAY, Correctional Officer, CAPTAIN ROBINSON, Correctional Officer and others
Lisa Lee-Bolton, et al v. Koppers, Inc., et al
as 17-11465
Petitioner:
LISA LEE-BOLTON, JAMES DUNCAN, CATHERINE MCMAHON and others
Respondent:
KOPPERS, INC., f.k.a. Koppers Industries, Inc., BEAZER EAST, INC., a Delaware corporation, f.k.a. Koppers Company, Inc. and BEAZER LIMITED, a foreign corporation
Lisa Lee-Bolton, et al v. Koppers, Inc., et al
as 17-90009
Petitioner:
LISA LEE-BOLTON, JAMES DUNCAN, CATHERINE MCMAHON and others
Respondent:
KOPPERS, INC., f.k.a. Koppers Industries, Inc., BEAZER EAST, INC., a Delaware corporation, f.k.a. Koppers Company, Inc. and BEAZER LIMITED, a foreign corporation
Alfred Days v. Mr. Crickmar, et al
as 17-10872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED DAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRICKMAR, Hays State Prison and CHIEF COUNSELOR HAMMOCK, Hays State Prison
In re: Warren Day
as 16-16885
Petitioner:
In re: WARREN F. DAY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Warren Day
as 16-15094
Petitioner:
In re: WARREN F. DAY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Gregory Day
as 16-12352
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY A. DAY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Gregory Day
as 16-11853
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY A. DAY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Curtis Hunter v. Correction Corporation of Amer, et al
as 16-10959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, WARDEN, RON DAY, Chaplain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
