Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,964
USA v. Michael Shirley
as 24-10937
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL COURTNEY SHIRLEY
Richard Warner, et al v. City of Marathon, et al
as 24-10901
Plaintiff: RICHARD E. WARNER, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II, JOHN W. PARENTE, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II and JOSEPH E. ARDOLINO, individually
Defendant: CITY OF MARATHON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, MICHAEL CINQUE, individually and as a City of Marathon Official, RALPH LUCIGNANO, individually and as a City of Marathon Official and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10874
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
USA v. Gavin Harold
as 24-10825
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GAVIN MICHAEL HAROLD
Physician's Central Business Office & Affiliates, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 24-10817
Plaintiff: PHYSICIAN'S CENTRAL BUSINESS OFFICE & AFFILIATES, MARIA CRISTINA CRESPO-SMITH, NESTOR JAVECH and others
Defendant: UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Type: Contract Insurance
Sean CaseyIn re: Sean Casey
as 24-10808
Petitioner: In re: SEAN MICHAEL CASEY
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Christina Vazquez-Klecha v. Michael Neely
as 24-10720
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA NECOLE VAZQUEZ-KLECHA
Defendant: MICHAEL NEELY
Christina Vazquez-Klecha v. Michael Neely, et al
as 24-10719
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA NECOLE VAZQUEZ-KLECHA
Defendant: MICHAEL NEELY
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE and ELIZABETH ANN BICKERSTAFF
Michael Brown v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
as 24-10690
Petitioner: MICHAEL JOHN BROWN
Respondent: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?