Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Emma Prospero v. Ryan Sullivan, et al
as 24-10086
Plaintiff: EMMA JANE PROSPERO
Defendant: RYAN SULLIVAN, RUSSELL PRESCOTT and JAMES PROCTOR
Donald Trump, et al v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 23-13177
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALINA HABBA, DONALD J. TRUMP, MICHAEL T. MADAIO and others
Defendant / Appellee: HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Wihly Harpo v. Robert Hunter, III, et al
as 23-12911
Plaintiff / Appellant: WIHLY HARPO
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT W. HUNTER, III, CARLETTA SIMS-BROWN, VERA L. BUTLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10949
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-14083
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 22-13410
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP
Defendant / Appellee: HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10292
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Latasha Barron v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources, et al
as 21-14022
Plaintiff / Appellant: LATASHA MECHELLE BARRON
Defendant / Appellee: MOBILE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, MYESHA LEE, Case Worker, SHANTAE WEBB, Case Manager and others
Tanda Lane, et al v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 21-13747
Plaintiff / Appellant: TANDA LANE, as administrator of the estate of John Paul Booher, PAT SULLIVAN BOOHER, JOHN BOOHER and others
Defendant / Appellee: PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?