Cases 1 - 10 of 69
George Presley v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles, et al
as 23-10489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, LLOYD J. SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-14263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-13438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, ROBERT TOOLE, DELOACH, FNU and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-12367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Jairus Moore v. Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al
as 21-13792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAIRUS BERNARD MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAIRMAN, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, VICE CHAIRMAN, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, BRIAN OWENS, State Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 21-11400
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, DELOACH, FNU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Quincey Smith v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-11632
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, BRAXTON T. COTTON, Vice Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCEY SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
