Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Social Life Network, Inc. v. Peak One Opportunity Fund, L.P., et al
as 23-11144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOCIAL LIFE NETWORK, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEAK ONE OPPORTUNITY FUND, L.P., JASON GOLDSTEIN, PEAK ONE INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
In re: Steven McDonald
as 23-11015
Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Tavares Farrington v. USP Atlanta Warden, et al
as 22-13301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVARES LENARD FARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN, MORENO, HARDIN and others
Arthur Darby, Jr. v. USA
as 19-14760
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR DARBY, JR.
Leeroy Jones v. Darby Wright
as 17-13133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEEROY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DARBY WRIGHT
Jeffrey Howe v. City Of Enterprise, et al
as 16-11453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY PAUL HOWE
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ENTERPRISE, a municipal Corporation, BERNEY PARTRIDGE, an individual, in his individual capacity, THOMAS ARIAS, an individual, in his individual capacity and others
Jim Hunt v. Drayprop, LLC, et al
as 15-14862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM HUNT, trading as the Hunt Club Clothiers
Defendant - Appellee:
DRAYPROP, LLC, MICHAEL BROWN and MARLEY MANAGEMENT, INC.
:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and DARBY BANK & TRUST CO.
Warren Lokey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, et al
as 14-14822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN LOKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of the business and property of Darby Bank & Trust Co., DARBY BANK & TRUST CO., DRAYPROP, LLC and others
In re: Elvin Darby
as 14-14818
Petitioner:
In re: ELVIN EARL DARBY
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Elvin Darby v. Warden, et al
as 13-14198
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELVIN EARL DARBY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
