Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matthew Hawks v. USA
as 22-11670
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW VAUGHN HAWKS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Matthew Hawks
as 17-12528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW VAUGH HAWKS
Randall Rolle v. City of Tallahassee, Florida, et al
as 15-14382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, NICOLE RAYSOR, Probation Officer, Department of Corrections, BRIAN ENGLES, Supervisor, Department of Corrections and others
Danny Hawk v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 15-12114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC
Obrian Hawks v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 14-10903
Petitioner - Appellant:
OBRIAN VALENTINO HAWKS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Michael Hawk v. Trent Robinson, et al
as 13-10208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GABRIEL HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
TRENT ROBINSON, PETE WOLFE, III, JAMES SIMPSON and others
USA v. Leroy Sullivan
as 12-11405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LEROY SULLIVAN, a.k.a. Chicken Hawk
Ray Mobley v. Hawk, et al
as 11-13970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY CHRIS MOBLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HAWK and CITY OF EATONTON GEORGIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-13829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Danny Hawk v. J. Heckenkamp, et al
as 11-10975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
J. HECKENKAMP, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Atlanta, RICHARD M. PENNINGTON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Atlanta, DARRYL FERGUSON, individually and in his official capacity as Asst. City-Solicitor for the City of Atlanta and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
