Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Richard Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11357
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and W. WOOD
John Wood, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 21-10485
Defendant / Appellee:
JOEL REMY, MARIAN S. KENNEY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN W. WOOD, JR.
USA v. Eldrick Wooding, Sr.
as 20-10533
Defendant / Appellant:
ELDRICK WENDELL WOODING, SR., a.k.a.Wendell W. Wooding, Sr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-11055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Antonio Buckman v. Ronnie Morris, et al
as 16-16171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO L. BUCKMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNIE MORRIS, Sergeant, BRANDON W. WOODS, Sergeant, J. OLIVEROS, Correctional Officer and others
W. Gay, et al v. Brencorp, Inc.
as 13-13075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
W. W. GAY, as Trustee of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds, RONNY E. ANDREWS, as Trustees of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds, LARRY COGBURN, as Trustees of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRENCORP, INC., a Georgia corporation
W. Gay, et al v. Brencorp, Inc.
as 12-14264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
W. W. GAY, as Trustees of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds, RONNY E. ANDREWS, as Trustees of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds, LARRY COGBURN, as Trustees of the Jacksonville Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 234 Fringe Benefit Funds and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRENCORP, INC., a Georgia Corporation
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-12958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
