Cases 31 - 40 of 655
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.R. v. US Leader Restaurants, LLC
as 3:2022cv01447
Defendant:
US Leader Restaurants, LLC and Taco Bell
Plaintiff:
Jamayia Richardson and J. R.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bell v. Osceola County Corrections
as 6:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell et al v. Pollock et al
as 8:2022cv02677
Plaintiff:
Rick Bell, Karen Bell, Brian Bell and others
Defendant:
Jason Pollock, Boom Content, LLC, Gravitas Ventures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Linda Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bell v. Secretary Of The Department Of Corrections
as 6:2022cv02012
Petitioner:
Colavito Anton Bell
Respondent:
Secretary Of The Deparment Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Secretary Of The Department Of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01210
Petitioner:
Colavito Anton Bell
Respondent:
Secretary Of The Deparment Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
