Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hobbs v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Wade Hobbs
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Walmart and Walgreens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Knudsen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv00927
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Plaintiff:
William Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnett v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 6:2020cv01949
Defendant:
Shower and Shower and Johnson and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Taneah Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 5:2019cv00230
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Crincoli et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 6:2019cv00884
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emilio Crincoli and Louise Crincoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Isa v. Johnson and Johnson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2019cv01115
Defendant:
Personal Care Products Council, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Isa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Manuel v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Manuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Izumoto v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01100
Petitioner:
Kaysha Izumoto
Respondent:
Coopervision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.