Cases 31 - 40 of 3,137
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, GERARD WILLIAMS and SAM QUINCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LOPER v. WATSON et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LOPER
Defendant:
JOVANT VALENCIA, DEAN WATSON, CLINT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BURNS v. GOOLDIN et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE KAIN BURNS and KEVIN LEE
Defendant:
CHERYL GOOLDIN, JOHN GOOLDIN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASON et al v. GERBER et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
LEE MASON and CASEY MASON
Defendant:
AARON GERBER, JAMES HITCHCOCK and BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DILMORE v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STACY DILMORE
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARRIS v. AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
DESTINEE MONET HARRIS
Defendant:
AFFIRM HOLDINGS INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WALTER v. DBNCH CIRCLE LLC
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN WALTER
Defendant:
DBNCH CIRCLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALVAREZ v. HOME DEPOT USA INC
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ALVAREZ
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
