Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
FRANKLIN v. TATUM et al
as 5:2011cv00374
Defendant: DAVID TATUM, HARRELL REVELL and WILLIAM STRAWN
Plaintiff: TERRI D FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. TUCKER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00531
Petitioner: FRANKLIN LEE JONES
Respondent: KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRANKLIN v. TIFT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE FRANKLIN
Defendant: RANDY TIFT, WALTER A MCNEIL and GENE HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. MCNEIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00198
Petitioner: FRANKLIN DELANO FLOYD
Respondent: WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
DEAN v. USA
as 3:2009cv00024
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: WARD FRANKLIN DEAN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GARLAND v. FLORIDA STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv00580
Plaintiff: ANTHONY D GARLAND
Defendant: FLORIDA STATE PRISON OFFICIALS, FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OFFICIALS and SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FRANKLIN v. SMITH
as 5:2008cv00017
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN PHILLIP MAURICE
Defendant: TERAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2007cv00254
Plaintiff: DAVID E. RONEY
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACK v. KAGAN et al
as 4:2007cv00009
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY BLACK
Defendant: G KATZ KAGAN, R DAVE MOSELEY, ABAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?