Cases 11 - 20 of 162
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17450
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DEONTE DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17482
Plaintiff:
RALPH DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16742
Plaintiff:
Raymond Duke
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16065
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14862
Plaintiff:
LORENZO DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUKES v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Terry Dukes, Sr. and TERRY DUKES, SR
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert McCallum, Jr., Chase Gregory, Tucker Gaffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUKES v. LAKULESH INC et al
as 4:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
ALLISON J. DUKES and ALLISON J DUKES
Defendant:
LAKULESH INC doing business as BAYMONT BY WYNDHAM MIDWAY/TALLAHASSEE and PRATIKKUMAR PATEL
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
COLT DUKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
