Cases 1 - 10 of 498
ERDMANN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
TYSON ERDMANN, TRAVIS SYBESMA, SEAN MURPHY and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00418
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
GREGORY EARL MURPHY, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO LLC
as 3:2024cv00236
Defendant:
GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
FREDERICK v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Defendant:
G ENGLISH, R HOWELL and L MURPHY
Plaintiff:
QUINTON FREDERICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MAHONEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34542
Plaintiff:
MURPHY MAHONEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31848
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
