Cases 1 - 10 of 28
ALEXANDER et al v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN L ALEXANDER and ROGER WALTER STEWART, JR
Defendant:
KILILO KIJAKAZI, JOE BIDEN, AMANDA STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
DEBRA ENTERPRISES LLC doing business as GAME-ON SPORTS CAFE and JAMES W DEBONA
EVERAGE et al v. BUNNING et al
as 3:2021cv00082
Defendant:
TIM SHORT, DAVID L BUNNING, VONCIL THACKER and others
Plaintiff:
EVERAGE REAL ESTATE INC, MARY JOE BUNDY EVERAGE, MARY JOE EVERAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. CHOCOLATE ROOM INC et al
as 5:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
PRENTICE LOWE, THE CHOCOLATE ROOM INC doing business as THE CHOCOLATE ROOM and CHOCOLATE ROOM INC The doing business as THE CHOCOLATE ROOM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. LEE et al
as 4:2019cv00011
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
MARCUS D LEE, ZACHARY M LEE, MARCUS D LEE doing business as JACK N SEVEN and others
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. ROBINSON JR
as 3:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
WILLIE E ROBINSON JR and WILLIE EDWARD ROBINSON, JR
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC v. BAHAMA BOBS COUNTRY CLUB LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS INC
Defendant:
BAHAMA BOBS COUNTRY CLUB LLC, ROBERT PEEK and CHARLES LEE POTEAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
