Cases 1 - 10 of 39
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDROS et al v. TINSLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDROS, JULIE ANDROS, KINGS PARKWAY, LLC D/B/A 67 MOTORS and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN TINSLEY, APRIL TINSLEY, NATIONAL INSURANCE CRIME BUREAU, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
KING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
W. K. and LEE KING
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE GEORGIA, STEFANIE HADLEY, CITY OF THOMASVILLE GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BUTT v. ZIMMERMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00214
Defendant:
BEN MARION, JACK PERRYMAN, WILL BACON and others
Plaintiff:
SOHAIL N BUTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ALPHONSE v. PRATHER et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
JEREMY MCCULLOUGH, DANIELLE FORTE, MARC DANTONIO and others
Plaintiff:
TYRUS KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HERRING v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00101
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, TODD MOBLEY, CHERYL PRESHA and others
Plaintiff:
INDANEKWA HERRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
