Cases 51 - 60 of 365
MOORE v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
JAIRUS BERNARD MOORE
Defendant:
BRIAN QWENS, BOARD, CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
ERIC ALLS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITTINGTON, OFFICER TURNER, OFFICER DEESE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00155
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, DORM OFFICER SMITH, DORM OFFICER MANN and others
Plaintiff:
EDGAR J MARTIN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANADA v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2021cv00070
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY, MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and MARK POST
Plaintiff:
ADAM J CANADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2021cv00030
Petitioner:
KYRON J SHARP
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOEL v. TELLER et al
as 1:2021cv00024
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY, KEVIN SPROUL, ALLEN D TELLER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ORLANDO NOEL, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINSTON v. Little et al
as 4:2021cv00012
Defendant:
TROUP COUNTY MAGISTRATE JUDGE, JEFF DURAN, JEREMY JONES and others
Plaintiff:
ROKEI J WINSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROOKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 5:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEFENSE ATTORNEY LARRY FOUCHE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
