Cases 1 - 10 of 24
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and Warden JOHN CROW, III
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Warden JOHN CROW, III, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KELLEY v. BOSTICK et al
as 1:2020cv00187
Defendant:
NURSE MANDY BOSTICK, SHERIFF ANDY HESTER and SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE
Plaintiff:
JASON KEITH KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAS v. MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ANDY DILLS, BOATWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDY SNEED
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, EDWARD PHILBIN and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF
as 4:2017cv00237
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOWELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA and ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Madison v. Hester et al
as 7:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
DONALD MADISON
Defendant:
ANDY HESTER, J BOZEMAN, TRIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
