Cases 21 - 30 of 37
WEEKS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
KEITH WEEKS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 7:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, GERALD MACKEY and TARHONDA ROCHELLE PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCMICHAEL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
JASON G MCMICHAEL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ROBERSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al
as 5:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHAVELLA ROBERSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BOSTON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
TYRONE BOSTON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
WINDOM v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
PAUL WINDOM
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SHARON R HEYOB
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
FEREBEE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FEREBEE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CHAMBLISS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D CHAMBLISS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CLEMENTS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
MILLON R CLEMENTS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
