Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant: WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCARBOROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: THOMAS SCARBOROUGH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff: LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant: WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. SCARBOROUGH
as 3:2020cv00130
Defendant: CAPTAIN DARREN SCARBOROUGH
Plaintiff: GREGORY R ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRIMON v. TIFT COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2020cv00013
Respondent: TIFT COUNTY JAIL and SHERIFF GENE SCARBOROUGH
Petitioner: DAVID A MCCRIMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KING v. DOWDEN et al
as 7:2018cv00123
Defendant: KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SCARBOROUGH et al
as 7:2018cv00122
Defendant: LT MONTGOMERY, KIM SCHWALLS, SGT LYNN PARKINSON and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2018cv00121
Defendant: KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. BERRY et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Defendant: WALTER BERRY, LISA ST JOHN, BENJIE NOBLES and others
Plaintiff: KURTIS LEE BROWN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. SCARBOROUGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00280
Plaintiff: IRIS NEAL
Defendant: DAVID SCARBOROUGH and LEE SCARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?