Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Douglas et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff: Erika Danielle Douglas and Keiana Danae Douglas
Defendant: Sheriff Frank Reynolds and Deputy Amanda Gergans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Gibson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv02694
Plaintiff: Andre Gibson
Defendant: City of Atlanta, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta Police Department and others
Rolfe v. Bottoms et al
as 1:2022cv02339
Plaintiff: Garrett Rolfe
Defendant: Keisha Lance Bottoms, Paul Howard, Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?