Cases 111 - 120 of 115,775
Ponce v. Fast Foot Enterprise, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02421
Defendant:
Darius Rose, Fast Foot Enterprise, LLC, Darius Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Jordan v. Evans et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stephan W. Jordan
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Evans, Ingram Logging Inc. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Swope v. USA
as 1:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Lakisha Swope
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
First American Title Insurance Company v. Edge & Kimbell Law, LLC
as 1:2024cv02395
Plaintiff:
First American Title Insurance Company
Defendant:
Edge & Kimbell Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riverdale MHP, River Valley Communities v. Hicks
as 1:2024cv02390
Plaintiff:
Riverdale MHP, River Valley Communities
Defendant:
Dashon Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Bussey v. Phams
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cicchi v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cicchi
Defendant:
Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
