Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,684
Jones v. Dillard's Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Plaintiff: Demetria Jones
Defendant: Dillard's Inc. and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02630
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
2425 Candler, LLC v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02575
Plaintiff: 2425 Candler, LLC doing business as Candler Village
Defendant: Derrick Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02419
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner: Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent: Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Petitioner: Jonathan Rice
Respondent: Warden Joshua Jones, Tyrone Oliver, Officer Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02360
Petitioner: Yakenski Stevens
Respondent: Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
FYR SFR Borrower, LLC v. Hall et al
as 1:2024cv02105
Plaintiff: FYR SFR Borrower, LLC
Defendant: V. Kesha Hall, Eugene Campbell and Jordan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?