Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stanley v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stanley
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Damon Hininger, Warden Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Jump et al
as 2:2020cv00068
Defendant:
FNU Keen, E. Neal Jump, FNU Bacon and others
Plaintiff:
Westley Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensen v. Jump et al
as 2:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Uylsses Hensen
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Mr. Keen and Mrs. Shuman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Gregory et al
as 2:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ray Anthony Marsh, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy Gregory, Sheriff's Department of Camden County, Georgia, Camden County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCumbers v. Bennett et al
as 2:2009cv00073
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen McCumbers
Respondent:
Wayne V. Bennett, Sonny Perdue and Jerry Keen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCumbers v. Perdue et al
as 2:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen McCumbers
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Jerry Keen, Wayne Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minchew et al v. Corbett et al
as 2:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Thomas Minchew, David Minchew, Paul Gordon and others
Defendant:
Ron Corbett, L. G. Newsome, Gunderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Queensborough v. Hickey
as 2:2007cv00091
Petitioner:
Keene Queensborough
Defendant:
Debra Hickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
