Cases 21 - 30 of 3,560
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In re: William Wright, Jr.
as 24-11191
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Juanita Williams
Defendant:
HealthMarkets Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Angelo Williams
as 24-11023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANGELO DEVON WILLIAMS
Williams v. Root Staff Corporation
as 1:2024mc21223
Plaintiff:
Stacey J. Williams and Stacey J. Edmonds
Defendant:
Root Staff Corporation
William Allen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-10973
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. ALLEN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Elena Saville v. Clarence Webb, et al
as 24-10998
Plaintiff:
ELENA LYADINA SAVILLE
Defendant:
CLARENCE WILLIAM WEBB, ROBERT ALLEN WHITWORTH, RANDY CLARENCE HOPPER and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Hill et al v. Warren Averett LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Susan Hill and Bryan Hirsch
Defendant:
Warren Averett LLC, Warren Averett Companies LLC, Mary Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Interested Party:
Greenspoon Marder LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
