Cases 31 - 40 of 116
In re: Freedom Unlimited
as 0:2019cv61655
Petitioner:
Freedom Unlimited
Claimant:
Joshua Bonn
Respondent:
Taylor Lane Yacht And Ship, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0185
USA v. Bobbie Kendle
as 19-13296
Defendant / Appellant:
BOBBIE LANE KENDLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shannon Tipton v. Houston Co. Board of Education, et al
as 19-12340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON TIPTON
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a local education authority, BOBBY HARRELL, in his individual capacity, KEN LANE, in his individual capacity and others
Joseph Lane v. USA
as 19-11555
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH LANE
Racette v. First Federal Credit Control, Inc.
as 2:2018cv14402
Plaintiff:
Lane Donovan Racette
Defendant:
First Federal Credit Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walden v. Walden et al
as 6:2017cv00531
Plaintiff:
Walden, Eagle Mountain Properties, L.C., Eagle Mountain Properties of Utah, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Jason A. Walden, Tiffany Walden, TI Mortgage Company and others
Petitioner:
Central Storage LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lane v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 5:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Janine Lane
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Ice Services, LLC v. Regal Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2018mi00001
Plaintiff:
Ice Services, LLC
Defendant:
Regal Marketing, Inc., Regal Marketing, LLC, W.G. Wireless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as 3:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lorraine J. Lane
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
