Cases 111 - 120 of 23,408
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carpenter and Jordan Carpenter on behalf of the Estate of Dennis Carpernter
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Danielle Rawl, Brittney Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anthony v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terry Anthony
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Clifford Brown and Daniel Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
State of Georgia v. Pittman
as 1:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Nadira A Pittman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Turner v. Fox More Staffing et al
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Fox More Staffing, Michael James, Michael Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Messer Franchises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Messer Franchises LLC, Lynn Messer Hawkins and Paul Messer
Valdez v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
Joshua Valdez
Defendant:
Zachary Martin and Clifford Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
