Cases 51 - 60 of 158,062
REDDICK v. OSBORN et al
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
QUINTON M REDDICK
Defendant:
PAUL OSBORN, KYLE ROWLAND and JAMES COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80780
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Hollis, Benjamin v. Cava et al
as 1:2024cv22459
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Hollis
Defendant:
Daniella Levine Cava, Moises Ramirez, Julian Comas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Meerten v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
James Van Meerten
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ellis v. Philbin
as 1:2024cv02825
Petitioner:
Marlon Maurice Ellis
Respondent:
Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. McFarlene
as 4:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Robert Dunlap
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlene
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
