Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PNC BANK, N.A. v. MStatus Consulting & Tax, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv60805
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MStatus Consulting & Tax, Inc. and Lissette Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED COMMUNITY BANK v. WRM HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00091
Defendant:
MITCHELL A NEASE, WRM HOLDINGS LLC, WORDE ANDERSON MCCLUNG and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED COMMUNITY BANK as successor by merger to formerly doing business as FIRST MADISON BANK & TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
First Home Bank v. C&M Construction, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
First Home Bank
Defendant:
C&M Construction, LLC and Cary Joe Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
James T. Anderson, Jr. and Mary H. Anderson
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Phil Anderson Holdings (II) Inc. v. Rosinus
as 2:2014cv00428
Plaintiff:
Phil Anderson Holdings (II) Inc.
Defendant:
Franz J. Rosinus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Temp Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01487
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Temp Properties, LLC and Newell Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Towne Village of Anderson, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Towne Village of Anderson, LLC, Covered Bridge at Jones Creek, LLC, Douglas C. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Empire Financial Services, Inc. v. Todd et al
as 1:2008cv00226
Plaintiff:
Empire Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Todd, III, Michael D. Brock, James R. Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
