Cases 1 - 9 of 9
First Home Bank v. USA Pro Roofing and Construction L.L.C. et al
as 8:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
First Home Bank
Defendant:
USA Pro Roofing and Construction L.L.C. and Daniel Scott Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. O'Connor
as 1:2016cv02907
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Kelly I. O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking & Trust Company v. Kelly Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02041
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company
Defendant:
Kelly Construction Company, Inc., Robert A. Kelly and Donna A. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Sedgwick et al
as 2:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Robert Allen Sedgwick, II and Kelly W. Sedgwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kasparov v. Schnorenberg
as 3:2015cv01093
Plaintiff:
Yuri Kasparov
Defendant:
Kelly Schnorenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Kasubra LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Kasubra LLC , DSS LLC , CMC LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANK OF THE OZARKS v. BASS et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
BANK OF THE OZARKS
Defendant:
J WILLIAM BASS, JR and KELLY P BASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
PNC Bank National Association v. Miller et al
as 6:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank National Association
Defendant:
Sanford Miller and Mary Kelly Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Kelly Capital, LLC et al v. Opa-Locka Airport Executive Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv21860
Plaintiff:
Kelly Capital, LLC, Kelly Capital, LLC, First Commercial Corporation and others
Defendant:
Opa-Locka Airport Executive Center, Inc. and Alexander Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
