Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Abeome Corporation Inc. v. J. Stevens, et al
as 24-10094
Plaintiff:
ABEOME CORPORATION INC.
Defendant:
J. HAMPTON STEVENS, LISA L. TORBETT and GEORGE CAMPBELL
Lewis v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Lewis
Defendant:
Matthew A. Hill, Margie Joanne Hill, David Robert Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ABEOME CORPORATION INC v. STEVENS et al
as 3:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
ABEOME CORPORATION INC. and ABEOME CORPORATION INC
Defendant:
J. HAMPTON STEVENS, LISA L TORBETT, GEORGE CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shah v. Raina et al
as 1:2021cv04662
Plaintiff:
Sunil Shah
Defendant:
Robin Raina, Hans U. Benz, Rolf Herter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lilienfeld v. Raina et al
as 1:2021cv04590
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lilienfeld
Defendant:
Robin Raina, Hans U. Benz, Rolf Herter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2020cv21950
Defendant:
Charles B. Coe, Dycom Industries Inc., Richard K. Sykes and others
Plaintiff:
Terry White and chris perkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
White et al v. Nielsen et al
as 1:2020cv21952
Defendant:
Charles B. Coe, Richard K. Sykes, Eitan Gertel and others
Plaintiff:
Terry White and chris perkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
MCDUFFIE et al v. SAUTNER et al
as 3:2019cv00087
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. RAFSKY, WILLIAM J. BRASSARD, AMY D. BRASSARD and others
Defendant:
619047 ONTARIO LTD., DAN SAUTNER, MICHAEL MCLANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Handelsman v. SMS Co. et al
as 4:2019cv10108
Defendant:
SMS Co., Marsha Stocker, Steven Handelsman and others
Plaintiff:
Burton Handelsman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Handelsman v. SMS Co. et al
as 9:2019cv80847
Defendant:
SMS Co., Marsha Stocker, Steven Handelsman and others
Plaintiff:
Burton Handelsman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
