Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pileta et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Froilan Pileta and Annis Quintana
Defendant:
Oliver Charles Brown, Bowen Logistics LLC doing business as Doug's Produce and Bowen Logistics LLC as owner doing business as Doug's Produce
Not Classified By Court:
Stephen G. Brannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bowen v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bowen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Medina et al v. Bowen et al
as 1:2019cv20357
Plaintiff:
Pedro Medina and Margarita Medina
Defendant:
Caleb E. Bowen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Medina v. Medina et al
as 1:2019cv20356
Defendant:
Pedro Medina, Caleb E. Bowen and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Margarita Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Redding v. Rogers et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Amanda Leigh Redding
Defendant:
Zane Edward Rogers and James Forrest Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Lowe
as 2:2015cv00048
Defendant:
Robert J. Lowe
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Renee Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Vernon Bowen
Defendant:
Arley Mikael Rhodes , Ryder Integrated Logistics Inc and State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOWEN-ARD v. COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC
as 5:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BOWEN-ARD
Defendant:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
PAUL R ARD, JR
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL BOWEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bowens v. Daniels et al
as 5:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Carmela E. Bowens
Defendant:
Frank A. Daniels and DBA FD Auto Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
