Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Spencer v. Bowlero Auburn, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kizzy Spencer
Defendant:
Bowlero Auburn, LLC and AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Grant v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Grant
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. doing business as AMF Bowling Lanes Savannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Chambers v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Chambers
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Chambers v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Chambers
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Castro v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Carlisle Corporation, Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. and Wendelta, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Theresa Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gocher-Wright v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04396
Plaintiff:
Karla Gocher-Wright
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brese v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 8:2020cv02469
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robyn Brese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reid v. Georgia Department of Labor et al
as 1:2020cv04032
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Labor, Ms. Bowles and Mark Butler
Plaintiff:
Rodney Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00346
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Hernandez
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DURRAH v. BOWLING GREEN INN OF PENSACOLA LLC, et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY DURRAH
Defendant:
ARRIETTA SCHLOTT and BOWLING GREEN INN OF PENSACOLA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
